Why am I moving? I am selling my house finally and none to soon if you ask me. I am selling for a plethora of reasons which aren't worth going into as they are boring, mundane and not the least bit interesting. However, it has meant putting half of my house in storage (which I completed today) in order for it to be staged. It has also meant bartering, begging, cajoling and pleading with various contractors and workers in order to implement the few cosmetic changes we needed to get done in order for it to go on the market in a couple weeks.
Although moving is miserable, this has been about as painless as it could be and I am sold on moving "part time" instead of all at once. Now that half the house is residing in storage and just my skeleton necessities are here, it has been a breeze to sort through anything I might want to clear out. So we are on track and I am pleased with how it's all gone. I can't wait til this thing has a big fat sign in front of it and I will eventually be relieved of all debt except my car payment!
While I have only been minimally stressed, the Polar Bear is another thing entirely. With so many people coming and going, he has officially lost his mind. With the behaviorist's blessing, we increased his Prozac to 60 mg per day. He will not walk through my neighborhood at all anymore. He wears himself out barking for hours straight. He is a walking ball of stress. I have also added 9 mg of melatonin to his Prozac which does seem to take the edge off.
Forget it. I'm leaving you.
The biggest upheaval for him has been my move to one of my upstairs bedrooms to sleep in the guest bed. My huge bed has been removed from my downstairs master along with everything else and he simply has not been able to adjust to that at all. He will not sleep in my room or in his bed, preferring instead to sleep in the living room on the sofa. I feel terrible for him but I refuse to sleep on the sofa with him although I have been tempted. It would only add to the upheaval, make it harder for me to sleep well and I finally decided what the heck, if he's happiest out there, there isn't any reason to force him to sleep in my room.
At the very least, I refuse to look at you.
The downside is my door is open at night now and those horrible bumsters keep me up at ungodly hours kicking their toys around, jumping on the bed and generally causing complete mayhem. Perhaps I will move them into storage too! Ha! Just kidding.
I will love you again if you get rid of those two hairballs...
Job changes are in their early stages of infancy but I am hopeful for the outcome. We'll see what happens but at least change is afoot.
Now for the other half of my sick leave life. I have immersed myself lately in books of the Middle East and Islam because of course, that was my degree and my interest in that arena does not wane.
The first book, Infidel, by Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an autobiography focusing primarily on her life growing up in East Africa and Saudi Arabia. She is most well known for her emigration to the Netherlands, her mastery of Dutch and her election to the Dutch Parliament. She left the country due to security concerns and settled in the US.





This book is worth reading for her story alone. It's also a book about the effects of Islam on women and she takes on a broader scope than just her own experience. She is more than strident in her condemnation of Islam and it's effects on women. She makes a compelling argument and certainly made me look at Islam in a way I had not imagined despite my fairly wide and varied reading on the subject.
She has a new book out which was recently reviewed in The Economist and I think the reviewer (whose name I forget) made a very salient point that while she may be justified in her views, you simply cannot expect, with a sweep of the arm, to eliminate a religion like Islam in a few productive years, which seems to be her ultimate goal. While I agree with her arguments and goals, she seems to have forgotten the very influences that made her so anti-Muslim - her mother and grandmother who were devout and devoted to many of its precepts for better or worse. To think you can erase centuries of not only a religion but an entrenched political system and way of life is naive and surprising considering her own experiences. She of all people should know what she is up against. So while the book was fascinating and made me think differently about the excuses the west tends to make on Islam's behalf (believe it or not), I think her philosophy needs far more work before it becomes viable.
So then I moved on to a book one of my squad mates loaned me out of pity for my boring existence. It was one of his text books from the UW by Bernard Lewis called From Babel to Dragomans.

Initially I was skeptical. My desire to relive the years when all I had to worry about was getting my reading done in time for the test was outweighed by a sudden feeling of "Oh my god, I have to read this text book or I will be a terrible student" even though it was entirely voluntary. I'm afraid I am a little too pragmatic for the ivory tower and I envisioned this book as being a tome with 18 million footnotes.
How wrong I was (and still am since I confess I haven't finished it). Lewis is one of the pre-eminent scholars of the Middle East alive today. Just his grasp of so many languages makes me feel like I am an uneducated neanderthal. More importantly, the book is comprised of various papers he has written during his long career and they are fascinating. They range from architecture in Ottoman Turkey to foods of the Middle East, to politics and beyond. The papers are short and despite Lewis' life immersed in higher education, his writing is remarkably accessible and readable by the average layperson. Great reading - thanks Dan!
Finally (for the blog, not for my reviews of which there are many more!), I was loaned a book called Acts of Faith, by Philip Caputo by a friend last week at one of our regular breakfast get togethers.

I loved this book. It's about the convergence of different faiths, different nationalities and different motives in the NGO/humanitarian aid culture of Sudan. Caputo is a Pulitzer Prize winning writer for the Chicago Tribune and several times, I had to check the back cover to remind myself this was a work of fiction. The book is almost 700 pages long and originally I thought I would try out the first few pages as a break from the Lewis book but after those first few pages, I was hooked. I read the entire thing in 3 days, fitting it in in every little nook and cranny of my day because it was so compelling.
Even though you get the sense throughout that this whole thing is going to end in a ball of fire, it's impossible to predict how and for whom. Aside from that element of suspense, this book really made me question the efforts the west makes in countries which barely qualify as such. Caputo's journalism experience gives him a unique insight into what is very much an insular and bizarre "aid" culture in many ways but more fascinating, into the motives of the people who work these humanitarian missions.
Personal disclosure: I will freely state I am whole heartedly against any kind of aid that is tied to religious belief and missions despite the fact that many of these agencies and missions undoubtedly do good. While I realize that if I were starving, dying of disease and suffering the horrors that the people of Sudan have suffered, I would not have the luxury of taking the high road and saying no to help from any organization because they are also trying to convert me. Yet it still galls me that these religious groups hand out food, water and oh, here's a Bible. While you're coming back from the brink of starvation, I'd like to remind you that that food came from god's children and jesus died for your sins. Horrifies me. This is certainly an element in the book and one which Caputo lets you decide about for yourself. In fact he withholds commentary through his characters on almost all the ethical quandries. And Caputo does not focus solely on religion - he does an admirable job of addressing every motive that surely is present in this culture.
Sometime ago I read a memoir of sorts called Dark Star Safari, written by Paul Theroux who decided, many years after having served in Africa in the Peace Corps, to retrace his steps from Cairo to Cape Town overland down central-east Africa. I found the book wholly depressing and no doubt accurate. Theroux reached the conclusion that Africa is in a far worse state now than back in his Peace Corps days. But more of note to me, were his observations of the work of the NGO's/humanitarian groups and the unintended consequences they bring to Africans. Theroux completely changed my consideration at that time, of switching careers into this field - something I had always assumed I would do at some point.
The binary effect of these two books has produced in me a complete paradigm shift in my outlook on humanitarian efforts. Does Africa still need them? Absolutely. But I think all too often, Caputo is right - the people delivering the goods are often there for their own hidden, sometimes dark motives and the end result is that which Theroux remarked upon. Africans still at the mercy of the west's ulterior motives.





